Future of the ocean

Future of the oceanFuture of the oceanFuture of the ocean

Future of the ocean

Future of the oceanFuture of the oceanFuture of the ocean
  • Home
  • Future
    • From Sea to Space
    • OandG support for DWM
    • 2023 IMO GHG Strategy
    • Equipment and Services
    • Understand climate change
    • Tidal Power as Standard
    • Cargo ships return
    • Future of the ocean
    • The-daily-3questions
    • 2 principles 1 question
    • Shipbuilding&robotisation
    • Shipbuilding-1
  • Maritime Security
    • Management Onboard
    • Cyber Risk Management
  • Interviews
    • Carly Jackson
    • A Compass and a Map
    • Merrill Charette
    • Ronke Kosoko
    • Scott Collins - Part 3
    • Scott Collins – Part 2
    • Scott Collins – Part 1
    • Ms JiWon Sung
    • Stan Bruce
    • Rob Phayre
    • Stephen J. Nicholas
    • Dana G.
    • Roberto Brandao
  • Technical resources
    • Ship Recycling
    • Wheelhouse_position
    • The-4-Risks
    • Class-vs-MarineWarranty
    • Optimisation-of-temp-mobs
    • LiftingAppls_TestLoads
    • Function-vs-rules
    • SimpleStrength
    • BulkheadsBuckling1
    • BulkheadsBuckling2
    • BulkheadsBuckling3
    • Links
  • Miscellaneous
    • Saving a (tiny) life
    • Go to sea and live life
    • BRAVE NEW WORLD
    • Statistics is an art
    • About technical magazines
  • Friends
    • Gail McGarva
    • Prize: The pi() divide
    • Prize Maritime Tattoo
    • PrizeStansABDShipbuiling
  • Team
    • Team
  • More
    • Home
    • Future
      • From Sea to Space
      • OandG support for DWM
      • 2023 IMO GHG Strategy
      • Equipment and Services
      • Understand climate change
      • Tidal Power as Standard
      • Cargo ships return
      • Future of the ocean
      • The-daily-3questions
      • 2 principles 1 question
      • Shipbuilding&robotisation
      • Shipbuilding-1
    • Maritime Security
      • Management Onboard
      • Cyber Risk Management
    • Interviews
      • Carly Jackson
      • A Compass and a Map
      • Merrill Charette
      • Ronke Kosoko
      • Scott Collins - Part 3
      • Scott Collins – Part 2
      • Scott Collins – Part 1
      • Ms JiWon Sung
      • Stan Bruce
      • Rob Phayre
      • Stephen J. Nicholas
      • Dana G.
      • Roberto Brandao
    • Technical resources
      • Ship Recycling
      • Wheelhouse_position
      • The-4-Risks
      • Class-vs-MarineWarranty
      • Optimisation-of-temp-mobs
      • LiftingAppls_TestLoads
      • Function-vs-rules
      • SimpleStrength
      • BulkheadsBuckling1
      • BulkheadsBuckling2
      • BulkheadsBuckling3
      • Links
    • Miscellaneous
      • Saving a (tiny) life
      • Go to sea and live life
      • BRAVE NEW WORLD
      • Statistics is an art
      • About technical magazines
    • Friends
      • Gail McGarva
      • Prize: The pi() divide
      • Prize Maritime Tattoo
      • PrizeStansABDShipbuiling
    • Team
      • Team
  • Home
  • Future
    • From Sea to Space
    • OandG support for DWM
    • 2023 IMO GHG Strategy
    • Equipment and Services
    • Understand climate change
    • Tidal Power as Standard
    • Cargo ships return
    • Future of the ocean
    • The-daily-3questions
    • 2 principles 1 question
    • Shipbuilding&robotisation
    • Shipbuilding-1
  • Maritime Security
    • Management Onboard
    • Cyber Risk Management
  • Interviews
    • Carly Jackson
    • A Compass and a Map
    • Merrill Charette
    • Ronke Kosoko
    • Scott Collins - Part 3
    • Scott Collins – Part 2
    • Scott Collins – Part 1
    • Ms JiWon Sung
    • Stan Bruce
    • Rob Phayre
    • Stephen J. Nicholas
    • Dana G.
    • Roberto Brandao
  • Technical resources
    • Ship Recycling
    • Wheelhouse_position
    • The-4-Risks
    • Class-vs-MarineWarranty
    • Optimisation-of-temp-mobs
    • LiftingAppls_TestLoads
    • Function-vs-rules
    • SimpleStrength
    • BulkheadsBuckling1
    • BulkheadsBuckling2
    • BulkheadsBuckling3
    • Links
  • Miscellaneous
    • Saving a (tiny) life
    • Go to sea and live life
    • BRAVE NEW WORLD
    • Statistics is an art
    • About technical magazines
  • Friends
    • Gail McGarva
    • Prize: The pi() divide
    • Prize Maritime Tattoo
    • PrizeStansABDShipbuiling
  • Team
    • Team

Futureoftheocean prizes the pi() divide

Dr. Ionas divide by pi() or the golden rule of any verification

I was lucky to have great teachers, great professors and exceptional mentors.

It is not something what everyone has therefore I have the duty and the burden to payback.

This is one of my biggest drives and I’m aware that it is something difficult to be understood by somebody who missed great teachers and professors and somebody who never had a mentor.


Three of these great professors are sitting on the top of the table on the front picture of this paper.  

They were (looking how they were sitting from left to right)

Prof. Dr. Ovid Popovici

Prof. Dr. Ion Bidoaie

Prof. Dr. Valeriu Ceanga


The younger men in this picture were my teachers as well and among them is captured for our memory my mentor Dr. Ovidiu Ionas.

Dr. Ionas was not my only mentor, Prof. Dr. Liviu Stoicescu, my Ph.D. coordinator was my other mentor but I have to recognize that Dr. Ionas was closer to me than anybody else with the role of teacher or professor maybe because he generously offered me some memorable lessons about what does mean to be professional and especially what does mean to be a sensible professional.


The people knowing me reasonable well have heard from my many words of wisdom and eventual anecdotes what presumably are originated from Dr. Ionas wisdom but it is one what I prize especially like a professional verifier.


This one is about the importance of dividing by pi() in the verification work and this I would like to tell you to the best of my memory and to the best of my application of it.

The rule

Dr. Ionas rule of dividing by pi() as enounce by himself in person is:

If one engineer verifies some engineering calculation (his own calculations or some other engineer calculation), and thinks that the results might be unrealistic, then this engineer should divide the values of the results by pi().


If the numbers resulted still look unrealistic then the results are wrong, terrible wrong. The issue is simple a gross error in inputs, in the arithmetic, in method or even in the judgement. 


If the numbers resulted after the division by pi() look better, say reasonable, then the problem is far more subtle an usually lays in the refinement of inputs or method… and yes… these cases are the most complicate ones…


I did my best to transit this wisdom further

... so I told some young engineers about it. It is no wander that I was asked why pi()… 

Honestly I have no idea why pi() and not 3 (the closest sensible integer) or 2 or maybe 5… anyhow, 10 already means one order of magnitude therefore everybody would know that something went really really wrong with that calculation.


Personally I like pi() maybe because it is a natural value; in the same way as after a quarter of century of structural engineering I came to admire the natural construction of the roots of some trees and to recognize directly that a certain design looks better (harmonious) than other…

Thank you very much Professor Ionas

  

Thank you very much Dr. Ionas - to be completely honest – thank you very much Professor Ionas – for revealing for me the value of pi() outside the circle but inside the magic of the human mind!

Text

The author of this text is Dr. Marius Popa, the founder of the futureoftheocean.com

Pictures

The team of Professors and Teachers of Naval Architecture and Shipbuilding Faculty of the University of Low Danube (Galati, Romania), as it was in the early 1990, is pictured in the front photography.


  

Thanks to Mony_Wee_Bonnie (Instagram) for the two “roots” pictures.

(Facebook: Mony Wee Bonnie)

Copyright © 2018 Future of the ocean - All Rights Reserved.


Powered by

Cookie Policy

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.

DeclineAccept & Close